Friday, August 23, 2013

Is There Greater Pain? When Christians Sin Against You


Over the years, I have heard other Christians say that they have been hurt more or in more painful ways by other Christians than they have by non-Christians. Of course, this should not be the case at all. Nevertheless, it is a topic worth considering. Having experienced pain at the hands of other Christians in the not too distant past, as my wife's and my reputation was smeared and I was even accused of not having absorbed some elements of the gospel, we (along with our kids) can attest that there appears to be some truth to this. Why is it that Christians are hurt by other Christians more than they are by non-Christians? How true is it to say that the pain from sin caused by other Christians is more painful than pain caused by non-Christians? Even more importantly, how do we overcome this pain?

In one sense, it really is more painful when a Christian hurts another Christian but in another sense it is not. It is not as though the sin committed against you in and of itself is necessarily worse (though it certainly can be), but rather the fact that it is a fellow Christian – a brother or sister in Christ – that makes it uniquely painful. Let me illustrate it this way. If an acquaintance at work lies to you, it may be an annoyance and even painful. Still, you may be able to shake it off, so to speak, in a relatively short period of time. However, if your spouse were to tell the same lie to you, that's a different story. Deep trust that is supposed to be a crucial characteristic of a marriage is broken; it can and often does take a long time to rebuild that trust even after true repentance has taken place and forgiveness has been granted.

The Westminster Larger Catechism provides us with a little help in this discussion. "Q. 150. Are all transgressions of the law of God equally heinous in themselves, and in the sight of God? A. All transgressions of the law are not equally heinous; but some sins in themselves, and by reason of several aggravations, are more heinous in the sight of God than others." Thus, while it is true that some sins in themselves are more heinous than others, it is equally true that there are other considerations which aggravate the pain of a sin - and this holds true when it that sin is committed against us. The Westminster Divines continued:

Q. 151. What are those aggravations that make some sins more heinous than others?
A. Sins receive their aggravations,
1. From the persons offending; if they be of riper age, greater experience or grace, eminent for profession, gifts, place, office, guides to others, and whose example is likely to be followed by others.
2. From the parties offended: if immediately against God, his attributes, and worship; against Christ, and his grace; the Holy Spirit, his witness, and workings; against superiors, men of eminency, and such as we stand especially related and engaged unto; against any of the saints, particularly weak brethren, the souls of them, or any other, and the common good of all or many.
3. From the nature and quality of the offence: if it be against the express letter of the law, break many commandments, contain in it many sins: if not only conceived in the heart, but breaks forth in words and actions, scandalize others, and admit of no reparation: if against means, mercies, judgments, light of nature, conviction of conscience, public or private admonition, censures of the church, civil punishments; and our prayers, purposes, promises, vows, covenants, and engagements to God or men: if done deliberately, willfully, presumptuously, impudently, boastingly, maliciously, frequently, obstinately, with delight, continuance, or relapsing after repentance.
4. From circumstances of time, and place: if on the Lord's day, or other times of divine worship; or immediately before or after these, or other helps to prevent or remedy such miscarriages: if in public, or in the presence of others, who are thereby likely to be provoked or defiled.

I realize this is a rather extensive list, but notice in particular the first item on the list, namely the persons offending. Connect that now with part of the second item on the list, namely the offended party being any of the saints. Generally speaking, we can see that each of these items can easily overlap, but more specifically, the Westminster Divines rightly noted that one of the things that makes a sin more heinous is a Christian sinning against another Christian.

This truth can be seen in the words of David in Psalm 55. He begins his prayer to God by describing his deep, deep anguish and pleads with God to hear him in his distress. What is the reason for his anguish? "For it is not an enemy who taunts me — then I could bear it; it is not an adversary who deals insolently with me — then I could hide from him. But it is you, a man, my equal, my companion, my familiar friend. We used to take sweet counsel together; within God’s house we walked in the throng" (Psalm 55:12-4). Notice how David's pain is due more to the offender than it is to the offense itself, which he admits he could bear if it had been an enemy who did it. It was a friend with whom he counseled, with whom he worshiped God. David doesn't stop here though. "My companion stretched out his hand against his friends; he violated his covenant. His speech was smooth as butter, yet war was in his heart; his words were softer than oil, yet they were drawn swords" (51:20-21). Note the fact that David's friend violated his covenant. While we are not told the specifics, we must remember how important the people in David's lifetime viewed a covenant. In those days a covenant was a solemn pledge or bond usually inaugurated by a ceremony indicating what would happen to the one who violated the covenant (see Genesis 15). Simply put, David was hurt by another professing believer and it seems that it hurt him more because of who did it rather than what was done.

Another such place that helps to illustrate this point is in what I call "the other Mathew 18." Most of us are quite familiar Matthew 18:15-19 and the process involved when a brother sins and refuses to repent potentially leading to excommunication. However, in a familiar parable that few remember occurs in Matthew 18 as well, Jesus teaches us what our heart attitude needs to be when a brother who sins against us repents. I'll come back to this below, but for now I want you to notice the debt of the fellow servant. We are told in the parable that the fellow servant owed the first servant a hundred denarii - an amount that is relatively tiny compared to the 10,000 talents the first servant owed his master to be sure. Nevertheless, the point that most teachers neglect to mention is that a hundred denarii is no small amount. A denarius was the usual daily wage for the common day laborer or foot soldier. Assuming a six day work week, you're looking at nearly seventeen weeks or four months of wages. Can you imagine if someone owed you four months of your annual salary? Jesus is in no way minimizing the pain sin can cause – sin hurts! Yes, I realize this is not the main point of the parable, but Jesus is certainly not ignoring the truth that it really hurts when a brother sins against you. He knows that you will find it difficult to forgive because it hurts and this is why He reminds you and me in this parable that we owe our infinite God an infinite debt that we cannot possibly repay... a debt which God forgave out of pity for us when we sought mercy from Him in faith. The point of the parable is that we cannot say we have understood God's grace in our lives if we are unwilling to forgive from the heart a repentant brother who had sinned against us. After all, while it is true that a hundred denarii is no small amount, it is a debt that is not insurmountable. The same is true of a brother's sin against you; it certainly may be painful, but it is not insurmountable.

The pain caused by the sin committed against you by a fellow Christian does not negate our responsibility to forgive him if he repents. Let's face facts here... it's hard to forgive. I submit to you that if you are having difficulty forgiving a repentant brother who sinned against you, then most likely you are not reflecting on God's love and grace nearly enough; you are not reflecting on the well-being and holiness of your brother; you are not concerned about the rift that exists between the two of you; you are not concerned about reconciliation. "Yes, but he really hurt me!" No doubt that is true, but remember our great and sympathetic high priest. He knows what it is like when sinned against; He knows what it is like to be mocked publicly; He knows what it is like to be abandoned and denied by His friends; He knows what it is like to be murdered by those whom He created. He knows. Turn to Him and repent of your own sin of holding a grudge. But how do you know if you're holding a grudge? Ask yourself these questions: Do you gossip to others about your brother and his sin against you? Do you post your mood on Facebook in order to get people to ask you what's wrong? Do you think about the sin rather than reconciliation? Has your own worship of God become cold and rote both privately and corporately? Do you rehearse in your mind over and over again exactly what you would say to that person and how you would say it if given the chance? These things do nothing but increase the rift between you and your brother; it causes bitterness and hatred to take hold of your thoughts and become deeply rooted in your heart when it is a desire for reconciliation to the glory of God that should be you main concern. Reconciliation ought to be your primary goal and granting forgiveness to a repentant brother is a huge step toward achieving that goal.

Forgiveness is hard precisely because sin hurts. Nevertheless, making a habit of meditating on the riches of God's grace in your life despite the infinite debt that you owe to Him will be the most important foundation for you as you seek to demonstrate the same love and grace to a fellow Christian who sinned against you. Granting forgiveness demonstrates to your brother and the world at large that you have comprehended the forgiveness you have received in Christ Jesus; it tells the world and especially your brother that fellowship in Christ is paramount to you. "Be kind to one another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, as God in Christ forgave you" (Ephesians 4:31). Remember – a brother or sister in the Lord who has repented has been forgiven by God, so how can you not also grant forgiveness? Granting true forgiveness from the heart to a brother in Christ is a wonderful testimony of the grace of the gospel in our lives.

Monday, August 12, 2013

Tribute to Morton H. Smith

It is with some tentativeness that I write this about a man whom I have known for only a few short years. There are many others who have known him far longer and can share much more than I ever could. Nevertheless, when I heard the news that the seminary where I received theological training (Greenville Presbyterian Theological Seminary) decided to grant Dr. Morton H. Smith emeritus status, I was overjoyed. The news of this can be found here. I had to smile when I first saw the GPTS news link because the photo used was taken with our camera, though there is some debate amongst the three photographers in the family as to who actually took the photo.


It was taken during the 2011 GPTS Spring Theology Conference. His love of preaching the word and Reformed theology was always evident to me. I had him for four classes at GPTS, the seminary which Dr. Smith helped begin. Teaching the truths of the Reformed faith always seemed to give him such life and fire in his eye. There was one particular time that I saw this which will always be ingrained in my memory. In my first year (2008-9) at GPTS, I had the class called "Introduction to Reformed Theology" in which he taught out of his Harmony of the Westminster Confession and Catechisms. Midway through the semester, Dr. Smith became quite ill with some kind of upper respiratory illness. One class was cancelled and the next week Dr. Pipa, the President of the seminary, taught the class in his place indicating that if needed he would take over and finish the class for Dr. Smith. Well, it wasn't needed and Dr. Smith returned to the classroom, though he was still recovering and a bit weak due to the illness. Yet that day he returned to the classroom as he taught the class, I watched his strength return and the gleam in his eye get brighter and brighter as he joyfully taught the doctrines of the Reformed faith which he loved so dearly. It was so evident that he loved God and His word and this was clear every time he taught or preached at the seminary.

Dr. Smith with Dr. George W. Knight III

Dr. Smith was also a consummate churchman. He was the first stated clerk of the Presbyterian Church in America (PCA) - a position he held for 16 years. In 2000 he was elected to be the moderator of their General Assembly. Dr. Smith loved and still loves the Church of the Lord Jesus Christ. He wrote a book that played an important role in the formation of the PCA in 1973. This book is entitled How Is the Gold Become Dim. It was required reading for my class on Presbyterian Church History. As I read the book, which traced the decades of decline of the PCUS, I was struck by how long Dr. Smith and others like him endured so many severe theological errors; he loved the church and fought hard to keep her from drifting rather than jumping ship too hastily to form another denomination. Eventually, he and others made the difficult decision to leave the PCUS and form the PCA in 1973. People in the church ought to take a lesson in patience from Dr. Smith and not be so hasty to leave their church over issues even though they may very well be legitimate. While some folks may leave a church over one issue found in one sermon, Dr. Smith pressed on despite many issues over the course of a couple of decades. On the other hand, ministers and elders of the church ought to read his book to avoid the same kind of theological decline Dr. Smith witnessed in the PCUS. As cliché as it might sound, history has a habit of repeating itself. I have always found it remarkable that the decline of various denominations around the world bears so much similarity with one another. Read his book and see if you recognize the same signs of theological decline in your own church.

Dr. Smith signing my copy of his Systematic Theology

It was an honor to learn from Dr. Smith during my years at seminary. I hope and pray that I can have even half of the love and devotion to God, the Bible, the Reformed faith, and the Church as Dr. Smith still has. Thank you Dr. Smith for your service to the Lord Jesus Christ and His Church; thank you for the example you gave to me and many others; may God give you many more years of faithful service to His Church. May God continue to raise up such defenders of the faith in Christ's Church.




Sunday, August 11, 2013

The Importance of the Five Solas - Soli Deo Gloria

According to the Westminster Shorter Catechism, "Man's chief end is to glorify God and to enjoy Him forever." This is one of the most well-known theological statements (answer, really) even among those who are not Reformed or Presbyterian. We have come to the last of the Five Solas namely, Soli Deo Gloria - to God alone be the glory. The previous four solas necessarily lead to this sola.

What exactly is glory? It is a word that is used in many different situations from sports to politics. Despite its wide use, it is not always easy to define the word "glory." It could easily fall into the common phrase someone utters when he finds it difficult to define something: "I'll know it when I see it." Well, when it comes to the God of the Bible and His glory, that is certainly true. The Hebrew word often translated as "glory" in the Old Testament comes from a root meaning "heavy," and some legitimate synonyms are abundance, splendor, brightness, majesty, etc. It could simply be described as the manifestation of the very Godness of God. In the New Testament, we see something similar. We get the English word "doxology" from the usual NT Greek word for "glory." Ordinarily, it can refer to brightness, yet words such as magnificence, excellence, dignity, and majesty are excellent synonyms as well. God has all glory in and of Himself and needs nothing to add to His own glory. If this is the case, then how can we assert that man's chief end is to glorify Him if He already has all glory in and of Himself? The simple answer is that as creatures made in His image, we do all things to reflect God's glory back to Him. This is what we do in a special way in our corporate worship services each Lord's Day as we gather as His redeemed covenant people. While all things that God created do glorify God (cf., Psalm 19:1), man as the pinnacle of God's creation is especially intended to give glory to God on High. "...everyone who is called by my name, whom I created for my glory" (Isaiah 43:7).

As true as it is that all of creation is to glorify God, this sola has a specific area of emphasis, namely the salvation that comes to man by grace alone through faith alone in Christ alone according to Scripture alone. Christians glorify God because of the redemption we have in Christ Jesus and God alone gets all the glory for that salvation. Any system of doctrine claiming that man must contribute works toward his salvation or cooperate along side of God's grace effectively robs God of the glory that He alone deserves. "For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast" (Ephesians 2:8-9). We see in these verses not only the fact that salvation is not from works, but we see a crucial result of that fact: no one can boast. Unfortunately, there are too many people in churches today that will have an attitude like one of the following:
  • God helps those who help themselves.
  • Jesus died for you because you're worth it.
  • Jesus is knocking on the door of your heart; won't you please let Him in?
  • God has done all He can; now the rest is up to you.
Mindsets such as these rob God of His glory (the last one in particular really makes my skin crawl). If you can help yourself, if you are worth it, if you let Jesus enter your heart when He knocks, and/or if you have to finish what God started, then you have every reason to boast. However, the Bible is clear: you could not and did not do anything to earn or contribute to your salvation. God alone is the reason anyone is redeemed by the blood of Christ. This is why all glory belongs to Him alone. God will not be robbed of His glory. "I am the LORD; that is my name; my glory I give to no other" (Isaiah 42:8).

As difficult as it may seem to some, the salvation you have in Jesus Christ is not about you. Yes, I realize that we are truly beneficiaries of His divine grace. Nevertheless, the ultimate purpose of your salvation is to glorify God. Notice these verses from the Old Testament: "Therefore say to the house of Israel, Thus says the Lord GOD: It is not for your sake, O house of Israel, that I am about to act, but for the sake of my holy name, which you have profaned among the nations to which you came. And I will vindicate the holiness of my great name, which has been profaned among the nations, and which you have profaned among them. And the nations will know that I am the LORD, declares the Lord GOD, when through you I vindicate my holiness before their eyes" (Ezekiel 36:22-23). The fascinating thing about these verses is that they are sandwiched in between a passage in which God pronounces judgment and another passage in which God promises salvation. It seems that the point is that God will do both for the sake of His holy name – judgment and salvation. To remove any doubt for the reason of the promise, in verse 32 God repeats the same idea following the promise of salvation. Thus, it is for the sake of His name and His glory that He saves sinners.

My friends, how can we not glorify God for His gift of salvation to us? If we ought to give God the glory because of His creation, then most certainly we ought to give God the glory because of His recreation of us in Christ! This ought to be our most automatic response when we reflect on His grace in our lives. It was certainly the case for the Apostle Paul. In his epistle to the Romans - his magnum opus, as it were - Paul bursts forth into a grand doxology at the end of chapter 11. "Oh, the depth of the riches and wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are his judgments and how inscrutable his ways! 'For who has known the mind of the Lord, or who has been his counselor?' 'Or who has given a gift to him that he might be repaid?' For from him and through him and to him are all things. To him be glory forever. Amen" (Romans 11:33-36). What would cause Paul to express himself in such a God glorifying way? From the middle of chapter 3 up to this point in the epistle, Paul had laid out for the Roman church his doctrine of salvation with some special attention given to the doctrine of justification. While this is clearly an oversimplification of what Paul has said in Romans, it is pretty obvious that this is the ground of his doxology - the theology of salvation in Christ. For Paul theology always led to doxology and it should do the same for us. If your study of theology, doctrine, the Bible, etc., does not bring you to doxology, then you're doing it wrong. How wise God is to be able to save sinners in a way that vindicates His holiness - He knew what was needed and He implemented it! How unsearchable His judgments that He would choose to save sinners and rebels from what they deserve! All things, especially our salvation, are from Him and through Him and to Him! You are saved Soli Deo Gloria - to the glory of God alone! Amen and amen.

Monday, August 5, 2013

The Importance of the Five Solas - Sola Fide


Our series on the five solas now moves to look at what many consider to be the heart of the matter, namely Sola Fide - faith alone. James Montgomery Boice noted that the Reformers called the doctrine of Sola Scriptura the “formal principle” of theology and the doctrine of Sola Fide the “material principle.”1 They called Sola Scriptura the “formal principle” because it is from the Bible that we derive our theology, i.e., the Bible is the ultimate source of what we are to believe concerning God and what duty God requires of man. On the other hand, the Reformers referred to Sola Fide as the “material principle” because it deals with the very heart or substance of what one needs to believe to be saved. There is a lot that needs to be fleshed out in order to understand the importance of this rich doctrine, and I remind you readers that this was not a novel invention of the Reformers, but rather a return to the truths found in Scripture.

In my last post, we saw that Sola Gratia means that all of salvation comes to God's people only because of His good pleasure to save sinners in Christ Jesus. The doctrine of Sola Fide is much more specific in its focus. This sola teaches us that God justifies a sinner through faith alone. Question #33 of the Westminster Shorter Catechism gives us a concise, yet excellent definition: “Q. What is justification? A. Justification is an act of God’s free grace, wherein He pardoneth all our sins, and accepteth us as righteous in His sight, only for the righteousness of Christ imputed to us, and received by faith alone.” There is so much rich material in this concise answer and some key words that I need to define in order for you to see the beauty of this truth. I’ll define the terms justification, imputation, and faith.

Justification


According to the Roman Catholic Church, to justify means “to make righteous.” Thus, in the eyes of Rome, justification is the process or the work of God making a sinner righteous. Faith is involved, but as noted in a previous post it is not sufficient; good works are required as well. Thus Rome teaches that justification comes by faith and works. I believe the fundamental reason for this belief that justification is a process is because the Latin translation of the Bible uses a word that does indeed mean “to make righteous.” Ironically, this Latin word is where we get the English word “justification.” However, the Bible was not written in Latin originally; the Old Testament was written in Hebrew (and a bit in Aramaic) and the New Testament was written in Greek. Marin Luther rightly noted that in the New Testament the Greek word for “justify” means “to declare righteous.” A Roman Catholic may object by citing Romans 5:19 where the Apostle Paul tells us that it is by the one man’s obedience (Christ’s obedience) that the many will be made righteous. However, that is not the ordinary Greek word for “to make.” In this case, it is a word means something like this: “to legally constitute into the class of.” In other words, because of what Christ has done, the act of justification is God's legally putting the sinner into the class of the righteous. It is also important to note that in Romans 5, Paul is contrasting justification in Christ with condemnation in Adam. Condemnation does not make a person a guilty, but rather it is an act that declares a person to be a guilty sinner. A bit more will be said on that below as it relates to Christ and His sacrifice. There is another somewhat subtle, but crucial difference between Roman Catholicism and Protestantism with respect to justification: Rome sees justification as a work whereas Protestantism understands justification to be an act, i.e., done only once. When God justifies a sinner, He declares that person to be righteous. But how can this possibly be so? After all, if God is holy and  just, is it not necessary for Him to uphold justice by punishing guilty sinners? How can He simply declare any sinner to be righteous when he is anything but righteous? This is where imputation comes into play.

Imputation


In connection with their definition of justification being “to make righteous,” Rome believes that when a person is justified, righteousness is infused into them in order to make them righteous. However, the Reformers recognized that the righteousness that comes from God to a sinner is imputed, or reckoned to him; some English translations of the Bible will say "reckoned" or "credited to" or something similar (see Genesis 15:6 and Romans 4:22). In order for righteousness to be imputed or reckoned to his account, it has to come from somewhere, i.e., there has to be a basis upon which God can stay true to His holy nature as He declares someone righteous. That righteousness comes from Jesus Christ, and this is part of the reason that Christ lived a perfect life on Earth. Christians tend to focus on only His death which takes away the sins of His people. However, as wonderful as that truth is, His perfect life was absolutely necessary for two reasons. Firstly, He needed to be a perfect, sinless sacrifice and most people recognize that right away. Secondly, His perfect righteousness in His obedience to the law is what is credited to our account, i.e., it is imputed to us while our guilt is credited to His account, i.e., our sinful guilt is imputed to Him. Thus, Christ is declared, or legally constituted a sinner; He is not made a sinner, nor is sin infused into Him. Our sinful account is credited to Him and this becomes the basis upon which He bears the full wrath of the Father. His perfect righteousness is credited to our account and this becomes the basis upon which God the Father can declare us righteous, i.e., justify us. Theologians have called this “double imputation” and “the great exchange.” Christ’s perfect righteousness is the ground of our justification. It is how God can be both just and the justifier of those who trust in Christ (Romans 3:21-26). Think about this for a moment - you who trust in Christ for salvation are legally as righteous as Jesus Christ! This is the basis of your justification or right standing with God. How does one appropriate this imputation and declaration of righteousness? This is where faith comes into play.

Faith


What is faith? "Faith in Jesus Christ is a saving grace whereby we receive and rest upon Him alone for salvation, as He is offered to us in the gospel."2 Notice that faith is not described here as a work. It is a gift from God (cf., Philippians 1:29). It serves the conduit through which we appropriate Christ and His benefits. It is through faith and faith alone that we are justified. This is why the Westminster Divines say that faith is "the alone instrument of our justification."3 Does Scripture affirm this truth? That is an important question considering that Scripture alone is the only infallible and inerrant rule of faith and practice - something the Westminster Divines knew so well. The Apostle Paul had to deal with this very issue. In his letter to the Galatians, he had to address the problem of those who said that one had to be circumcised in order to be saved, i.e., one had to obey the law to be saved (cf., Acts 15:1, 5). Paul tells the Galatian church about the time he had to confront the Apostle Peter because his actions were leading people astray (see 2:11ff). While speaking to Peter, Paul said, “yet we know that a person is not justified by works of the law but through faith in Jesus Christ, so we also have believed in Christ Jesus, in order to be justified by faith in Christ and not by works of the law, because by works of the law no one will be justified” (Galatians 2:16). For Paul, this was the heart of the gospel and he took the matter with all seriousness - so much so that under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit he said that anyone who preached another gospel was anathema, i.e., accursed or eternally condemned (Galatians 1:8-9). Roman Catholics will be quick to reply, “Ah, but what about James 2:24? James says we’re justified by works and not by faith alone!” Do we have a contradiction in the Bible? Is this a battle royale between Paul and James? Of course not. James is dealing with a different issue. While Paul was dealing with the issue of legalism, James was dealing with antinomianism (it simply means "against law"). There were those who claimed that since we’ve been saved we can do whatever we want and obedience to the law do not matter at all since we believe. James said that such a faith is a dead faith. It’s important to read the whole passage in second half of James 2, but especially note the question he was answering: “What good is it, my brothers, if someone says he has faith but does not have works? Can that faith save him?” (James 2:14). The simple answer is "No." James in no way taught justification by faith plus works nor did he contradict the doctrine of justification by faith alone.

To get this doctrine wrong is to get the gospel wrong and to get the gospel wrong leaves no hope for sinners. This is why Martin Luther said, “When the article of justification has fallen, everything has fallen…. This is the chief article from which all other doctrines have flowed…. It alone begets, nourishes, builds, preserves, and defends the church of God; and without it the church of God cannot exist for one hour.”4 To put this more positively, this is a doctrine of such profound beauty. It is a doctrine that frees us from all unnecessary burdens because we rest on Christ and His righteousness alone. We receive from God a declaration of righteousness through faith; we receive Christ’s perfect righteousness to our own account. We need only trust in Christ and His work. We need only receive and rest upon Christ alone as He is offered to us in the gospel. God pardons our sins and accepts us as righteous in His sight, and this comes to us Sola Fide – by faith alone.





1 James Montgomery Boice, Whatever Happened to the Gospel of Grace?: Recovering the Doctrines That Shook the World (Wheaton, Ill.: Crossway Books, 2001), 129.  

2 Westminster Shorter Catechism Q.86. 

3 Westminster Confession of Faith XI.2 

4 Cited in Boice, Whatever Happened to the Gospel of Grace?, 130.